Re: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Update 1 *Beta* AvailabilityAnnouncement

[John Haxby <jch scalix com>]

Tim Powers wrote:

> First, it's safe to consider the changed packages in Update 1 as a 
> collection of erratas.
>
> If a package requires an errata of any kind and the package has been 
> released as an errata previously, then the new errata will be based 
> off of the latest package (in this case what was already released as 
> an errata).
>
> If a package requires an errata and there are no previous erratas for 
> that package, then the errata will be based off of the original GA'ed 
> package.

Makes sense to me.   However, I'm reminded of that old self-referential 
appendix on page 395 of a book.   Here's the complete page:

-------------------
Appendix E: Errata

p395:  For "Errata", read "Erratum"
-------------------

jch :-)