Re: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Update 1 *Beta* AvailabilityAnnouncement

[Tim Powers <timp redhat com>]

John Haxby wrote:
> Tim Powers wrote:
>
> > First, it's safe to consider the changed packages in Update 1 as a 
> > collection of erratas.
> >
> > If a package requires an errata of any kind and the package has been 
> > released as an errata previously, then the new errata will be based 
> > off of the latest package (in this case what was already released as 
> > an errata).
> >
> > If a package requires an errata and there are no previous erratas for 
> > that package, then the errata will be based off of the original GA'ed 
> > package.
>
>
> Makes sense to me.   However, I'm reminded of that old self-referential 
> appendix on page 395 of a book.   Here's the complete page:
>
> -------------------
> Appendix E: Errata
>
> p395:  For "Errata", read "Erratum"
> -------------------

Bah. Quit messing with my reality.


--
Tim Powers
Technical Lead, Release Engineering
Red Hat, Inc.