[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RHE AS miss openoffice.



Le mer 30/07/2003 à 23:11, Kevin Sonney a écrit :
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:59:34 -0700 John Costello
> <John Costello synopsys com> wrote:
> > If I understand this thread so far, a developer who takes AS 3.0 and 
> > installs the  OpenOffice RPM from WS 3.0 will have a system that is
> > not supported by Red Hat.  Is that a correct interpretation of Red
> > Hat's position?
> 
> Not at all. We just won't support the OpenOffice part of the setup,
> since it's not part of the AS distribution. It's the same as installing
> webmin on AS 2.1 and asking us to support that. 

Warning : I have a poor English !

What i don't like in the RHE offer is that server and workstation are
too separated.

Suppose I buy a RHE AS (at least $1500!, but RedHat do a good jobs, good
support, ...) for server purpose. There is no Ooo, cdrecord... but it's
not the problem right now. I also want to buy two systems for developers
who work on the application that run the server (AS) and/or test new
developments. This two systems are also used to write reports by
developers, read documentations in word and pdf format, manage the
project with mrproject, ...

I can't buy 2 WS since this OS miss some packages from AS.

Ideally i want :
- 1 AS
- 2 ES with packages currently only in WS.

What i can get from MS :
- 1 Window Server
- 2 Window Server + Office

My three MS systems are fully supported by MS. And Redhat don't offer
this.

So Redhat could add the packages currently only in WS into AS/ES or
provide an "office service pack" to AS/ES.

I am don't asking to add packages not in RHE. I want something that
merge AS/ES and WS.

Since AS and ES is more expensive than WS, i don't really understand the
Redhatproblem to add workstation programs to AS/ES. If the system is
only used for server purpose, those programs are not used. But Perhaps
some customers will buy ES systems (with workstation facilities) instead
of WS because ES (+ packages currently only in WS) is a more versatile
system.

If ES and WS share the same price, i understand that is a problem for
Redhat to add workstation facilities to ES.

-- 
Féliciano Matias <feliciano matias free fr>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]