On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 10:36, Ed Wilts wrote: > Samba, Apache, and sshd are all included in WS. Missing are an ftp > server, and servers such as bind and ldap. You could, however, add > those by building them from the source rpms from AS/ES. If you can't > build them from the source rpms, you shouldn't be taking the RHCE anyway > :-). Good point. :-) > > They're confused as to whether they should focus on > > technologies/versions of things included in RHL 9, Fedora Core, or RHEL > > 3. In the near-term the test is still RHL 9, I understand that, but I'm > > trying to get an idea of what it will be in a month or two. I guess it > > will just be "wait and see." > > I thought the focus had already switched to RHEL and that the test had > switched. It simply does not make sense for Red Hat to focus on RHL 9 > or Fedora in the future. RHL 9 is effectively obsolete by April 30 > after which there will be no more errata and no RHL 10 to replace it. > Fedora is a project - not a product - and has no official support, so > training on it would not be in Red Hat's best interest. > > Focus on RHEL - that's the obvious direction for Red Hat. I agree with you that makes sense. However, the test has not switched -- it is on Red Hat Linux 9 currently -- and I was just wondering when this switch would take place. --Jeremy -- /---------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jeremy Portzer jeremyp pobox com trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \---------------------------------------------------------------------/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part