Re: kernel-source updated but not installed.

[Arjan van de Ven <arjanv redhat com>]

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:37:53PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:27:03PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> > eg: we reserve the right to change how this all works, but we do keep the
> > /lib/ thing working. 
> 
> Yes, ok, I could accept /lib/modules/kernelversion/..., but I don't
> like the relation with the *running* kernel in "uname -r", as if
> building modules has to be for the running kernel.

it's mostly true in RHEL3 because of the SMP/UP/Hugemem ifdef junk..