[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Quick cluster licensing question
- From: "Collins, Kevin (MindWorks)" <KCollins chevrontexaco com>
- To: "Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)" <taroon-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: Quick cluster licensing question
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:33:17 -0800
Maybe I'm wrong, but my understanding of the original question (and what
I responded to) was the licensing of RHEL itself and not the cluster
package. If you have a cluster, you pay for an RHEL license for the
installed OS on each node.
If something has changed in the last few months(quite possible), or if I
misunderstood the original question, I apologize.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: taroon-list-bounces redhat com
[mailto:taroon-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:24 AM
To: Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Subject: Re: Quick cluster licensing question
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 09:15:51AM -0800, Collins, Kevin (MindWorks)
wrote:
> I was involved (tangentially) in meetings our HPC group was having
about
> RHEL licensing and clustering, and the answer at the time (a few
months
> ago) was that each node is an installed RHEL system and you must have
a
> license for each installed RHEL system.
I believe we need to be clearer on the terminology. You do not need a
LICENSE - the cluster pieces are GPL'd and are in fact part of Tao Linux
and other RHEL rebuilds. What Red Hat sells is SUPPORT for the
clustering pieces.
--
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts ewilts org
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list redhat com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]