[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Quick cluster licensing question



Also, there are some provisions of copyright law that explicitly define distribution in some cases not involving money as commercial. For example, distribution of more than a certain number of copies or dollar value, or distribution with an expectation of getting something in return later.

On Dec 17, 2004, at 11:54, Jeffrey Siegal wrote:

It involves commerce, but not necessarily money. Barter is commerce, as are things like free samples given away to promote a product or service.

On Dec 17, 2004, at 11:44, Collins, Kevin (MindWorks) wrote:

Its all semantics, but commercial derives from commerce, which involves
exchanging money for goods or services...


-----Original Message-----
From: taroon-list-bounces redhat com
[mailto:taroon-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Siegal
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 11:36 AM
To: Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Subject: Re: Quick cluster licensing question


It probably doesn't mean "money changes hands" but giving a copy or two


to a personal friend is probably not commercial distribution.

On Dec 17, 2004, at 10:01, Collins, Kevin (MindWorks) wrote:

And by "commercial redistribution", one would infer that means money
changes hands. So giving it away is completely legit...

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: taroon-list-bounces redhat com
[mailto:taroon-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Jay Turner
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 9:56 AM
To: Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Subject: Re: Quick cluster licensing question


On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:09:00AM -0500, William Hooper wrote:
I agree with most of what Jay said, except...

Jay Turner said:
[snip]
You friend wants RHEL,
hand him/her your discs/access to the code and he will be up and
running
at no cost.

This could be at odds with Red Hat's Trademark guidelines (because
you
would be distributing their trademarked material along with the
software).
 This is the real reason all of these rebuild exist, to removed RH's
trademarks where needed.

And oddly enough, even reading the EULA myself right now, I'm
confused.

"Customer should read the information
found at http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/ before
distributing a copy of the Software, regardless of whether it has
been modified. If Customer makes a commercial redistribution of
the Software, unless a separate agreement with Red Hat is executed
or other permission granted, then Customer must modify the files
identified as ~ ~\REDHAT-LOGOS~@~] and ~ ~\anaconda-images~@~] to
remove all images containing the ~ ~\Red Hat~ ~] trademark or the
~ ~\Shadowman~@~] logo. Merely deleting these files may corrupt
the Software."


That seems to imply that non-commercial redistribution doesn't require
modification. Heck, I'm guilty of violating my own company's EULA if

it

has your meaning :-)

- jkt

-- --*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
*--*
--*
Jay Turner, QA Technical Lead jkt redhat com Red Hat,
Inc.


            If I had only known, I would have been a locksmith.
                                                   - Albert Einstein

--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list redhat com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list



--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list redhat com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list

-- Taroon-list mailing list Taroon-list redhat com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list



--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list redhat com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]