[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Missing a Tux?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv redhat com>
- To: "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" <dsavage peaknet net>
- Cc: "Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 \(Taroon\)" <taroon-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Missing a Tux?
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:55:01 +0100
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 04:49:02AM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 09:09 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 23:32 -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> > > During the initial boot-up phase on an SMP system, shouldn't I see more
> > > than one smiling Tux image at the top of the screen? I do on all the
> > > dual Xeon systems at work, but not on my dual Athlon system at home.
> >
> > actually you shouldn't see any tux image; you only see such an image if
> > you manually enable graphical framebuffer... which in turn has a quite
> > significant risk of disturbing XFree86's operation...
>
> Arjan,
>
> Well, now that you mention it, I do set vga=795 in grub and a smaller
> system font size so I don't have to track boot-ups through a 25-line
> peephole. But I've never noticed any negative effects on X.
there are other ways to do that... like by setting the font to 8x8 :)
> (And for heaven's sake what are you doing up at this hour??? :-))
in europe... it's not that bad a time to be awake ;)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]