[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: RHEL 3 vs. FC1 vs. gnome
- From: "Molina, Thomas" <thomas molina ngc com>
- To: "Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)" <taroon-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: RHEL 3 vs. FC1 vs. gnome
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 06:00:17 -0700
> I don't think it'd be possible to have FC1 and RHEL3 use the same
> $HOME/.gnome without a mountain of headaches. However, you
> may be able to
> get RHEL3 or FC1 to use $HOME/gnome-2.2 and $HOME/gnome-2.4. Your
> settings won't be synced between RHEL3 and FC2 but you will
> at least be
> able to use the same $HOME. Look out for other apps that have similar
> issues. Mozilla comes to mind... You could just update
> RHEL3 to the same
> Mozilla version as FC1 (1.6?).
> Stephen Walton said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just got a couple of shiny new Dell workstations with RHEL WS 3.0
> > preinstalled. Trouble is, our current workstations as well as the
> > server which holds everyone's /home via NFS are running
> FC1. The only
> > conflict, but it's a big one, is Gnome 2.2 vs. 2.4.
Would it be possible to upgrade the FC1 machines to FC2? I have a
a test machine I switch between FC2 and RHEL 3. The root directory
of each is in a removable caddy. /home and /usr/local are mounted
from a separate drive. I have not noted any anomalies in sharing
$HOME configuration files between the two.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]