[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: NIC bonding + IP alias?
- From: Brian Long <brilong cisco com>
- To: "Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)" <taroon-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: NIC bonding + IP alias?
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:44:51 -0400
Brian,
Thank you. Is the probeall line required? I read about it in
bonding.txt, but I haven't seen the need to insert it.
My problem was that I had bond0 defined and I tried defining bond0:1 not
realizing bond0:0 should have been my first alias.
Thanks again.
/Brian/
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 15:03, Baker, Brian (ISS - Houston) wrote:
> Attached is a pdf for IP aliasing on a bond.
> Look at the "Logs" file for configuring multiple IP addresses to a bond.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taroon-list-bounces redhat com
> [mailto:taroon-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Brian Long
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 8:31 AM
> To: taroon-list redhat com
> Subject: NIC bonding + IP alias?
>
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone successfully implemented NIC bonding and IP alias on the same
> NICs?
>
> I have a HP DL380 with 2 onboard 1000BaseT and 1 PCI 1000BaseSX (all
> tg3). I currently have a bond0 interface working between an onboard NIC
> and the PCI GigE card. The issue is that I want those same NICs to
> service multiple IP addresses.
>
> I do not see this combination mentioned in any Red Hat documentation or
> in the kernel bonding.txt file. I hoped I could create ifcfg-bond0:1 to
> alias an IP on top of the existing bond but it didn't work.
>
> Any ideas would be appreciated.
>
> /Brian/
--
Brian Long | | |
Americas IT Hosting Sys Admin | .|||. .|||.
Cisco Linux Developer | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:..
Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]