[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: nfs options

From: David Aquilina <dwaquilina gmail com>
To: "Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)" <taroon-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: nfs options
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:23:07 -0400

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:15:31 -0700, Cheryl L. Southard
<cld astro caltech edu> wrote:
> Now, I think 8192 is way too small and we can go as high as 32768, but I
> haven't tested out that number yet.

I've heard reports from other guys here that 32768 seems to make
NetApps VERY unhappy, and that 8K was really the optimal size.

-- 
David Aquilina, RHCE
dwaquilina gmail com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nfs options
  - From: Don MacAskill

References:
- nfs options
  - From: Derek T. Yarnell
- Re: nfs options
  - From: Cheryl L. Southard

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]