Re: Sunxclaims Solaris86 Faster than RHEL3 (Sun marketing pdf)

[Zate Berg <zate75 gmail com>]

dont wanna do that.  RHEL is ALOT more expensive than Solaris.  At
least where i work it is.  Damned sun global support contracts.

Actually SUSe has a great model for support of Linux, tickets.  So i
dont need to pay $2500 a year for each server.

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:58:18 -0000, James Marcinek
<jmarc1 jemconsult biz> wrote:
> Did they mention the cost of their O/S platform and compare cost to performance
> ratio?
> 
> &quot;Stephen J. Smoogen&quot; &lt;smooge gmail com&gt;,&quot;Discussion of Red
> 
> 
> Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)&quot; &lt;taroon-list redhat com&gt; wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:06:18 -0700 (PDT), shane stixrud org
> > <shane stixrud org> wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.sun.com/emrkt/nettalk/sun_network_systems_nettalk.pdf
> > >
> > > No details of course, but interesting to see how Sun plans on selling
> > > solaris vs RedHat.
> > >
> >
> > It might be possible... Of course it could also be them comparing 32
> > bit kernels versus 64 bit ones... but I would only expect that from
> > Microsoft.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stephen J Smoogen.
> > Professional System Administrator
> >
> >
> > --
> > Taroon-list mailing list
> > Taroon-list redhat com
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Taroon-list mailing list
> Taroon-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
> 



-- 
Zate