[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: swig and subversion

From: Ed Wilts <ewilts ewilts org>
To: Stephen Gardner <stephen-rhel uk org>, "Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)" <taroon-list redhat com>
Cc:
Subject: Re: swig and subversion
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:48:21 -0500

On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 04:14:03PM +0100, Stephen Gardner wrote:
> Just a couple of notes on this, firstly I see that the Subversion binary 
> packages page does have a reference to a maintained set of RPMs which 
> include RHEL3 (in fact it's whitebox-el3) but it also includes a new swig 
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

These two are mutually exclusive.  You're either RHEL3 or you're whitebox.
You can't be both.

        .../Ed

-- 
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts ewilts org
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program

Follow-Ups:
- Re: swig and subversion
  - From: Jos Vos

References:
- swig and subversion
  - From: bob flynn
- Re: swig and subversion
  - From: Jos Vos
- Re: swig and subversion
  - From: Stephen Gardner

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]