[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: swig and subversion



On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:48:21AM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 04:14:03PM +0100, Stephen Gardner wrote:
> > Just a couple of notes on this, firstly I see that the Subversion binary 
> > packages page does have a reference to a maintained set of RPMs which 
> > include RHEL3 (in fact it's whitebox-el3) but it also includes a new swig 
>           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> These two are mutually exclusive.  You're either RHEL3 or you're whitebox.
> You can't be both.

Well, Stephen was referring to a "maintained set of RPMs" and I can imagine
a 3rd party RPM is said to be made for RHEL3, although it is built/maintained
on a RHEL3 rebuild.

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]