[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: swig and subversion
- From: Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
- To: "Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)" <taroon-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: swig and subversion
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:59:45 +0200
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:48:21AM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 04:14:03PM +0100, Stephen Gardner wrote:
> > Just a couple of notes on this, firstly I see that the Subversion binary
> > packages page does have a reference to a maintained set of RPMs which
> > include RHEL3 (in fact it's whitebox-el3) but it also includes a new swig
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> These two are mutually exclusive. You're either RHEL3 or you're whitebox.
> You can't be both.
Well, Stephen was referring to a "maintained set of RPMs" and I can imagine
a 3rd party RPM is said to be made for RHEL3, although it is built/maintained
on a RHEL3 rebuild.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]