Re: swig and subversion

[Ed Wilts <ewilts ewilts org>]

On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 06:44:35PM +0100, Stephen Gardner wrote:
> Indeed, my point was the RPMs are being kept current (ie. have a 
> maintainer).
> 
> If you visit the Subversion download page you'll see it quoted as
> 
> "Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3 / Redhat Enterprise Linux 3"
> 
> beneath a Red Hat logo but the URL for the download includes 
> "whitebox-el-3" and I therefore brought that to Bob's attention by 
> mentioning it in my reply.

My point is that Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3 is not equivalent to Red
Hat Enterprise Linux.  They may have most of the same code base but the
resultant binaries are not the same.  Therefore it's quite possible for
packages that work one to not work on the other.

-- 
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts ewilts org
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program