RE: EM64T Support

[Arjan van de Ven <arjanv redhat com>]

On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 11:57 +0300, Celal UNALP wrote:
> Which one is correct?
> 
> kernel-2.4.21-27.EL.athlon.rpm
> kernel-smp-2.4.21-27.EL.i686.rpm
> kernel-2.4.21-27.EL.i686.rpm
> kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-27.EL.athlon.rpm
> kernel-BOOT-2.4.21-27.EL.i386.rpm
> kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-27.EL.i686.rpm
> kernel-doc-2.4.21-27.EL.i386.rpm
> kernel-source-2.4.21-27.EL.i386.rpm
> kernel-hugemem-2.4.21-27.EL.i686.rpm
> kernel-unsupported-2.4.21-27.EL.athlon.rpm
> kernel-hugemem-unsupported-2.4.21-27.EL.i686.rpm
> kernel-unsupported-2.4.21-27.EL.i686.rpm
> kernel-pcmcia-cs-3.1.31-13.i386.rpm
> kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.7.i386.rpm
> kernel-smp-2.4.21-27.EL.athlon.rpm
> 
> How can I identify the x86_64/em64t?

this is the 32 bit distro.

You should get the 64 bit distro....

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part