Re: up2date won't update openoffice

[Chuck Campbell <campbell accelinc com>]

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:32:38AM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> redhat.com?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list>,
> 	<mailto:taroon-list-request redhat com?subject=subscribe>
> Sender: taroon-list-bounces redhat com
> Errors-To: taroon-list-bounces redhat com
> Content-Length: 1562
> Lines: 39
> 
> On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 10:48 +0300, Jussi Silvennoinen wrote:
> > > I have two machines running RHEL3-U5.  Both are dual Opteron, running
> > > 64 bit.  Both are entitles.  One is WS and one is ES.  Both behave identically
> > > with respect to the information below.
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > redhat-artwork                          0.73.2         2E                  
> > > startup-notification                    0.5            1                   
> > > libmng                                  1.0.4          3                   
> > > 
> > > file /usr/share/man/man1/bonobo-activation-server.1.gz from install of bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1 conflicts with file from package bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1
> 
> It looks like a multilib conflict.
> 
> Do you see an i386 and x86_64 version of bonobo-activation when you run:
> 
> rpm -q bonobo-activation --qf "%{NAME} %{ARCH}\n"

When I do that I see only the bonobo-activation x86_64 one, no .i386


> 
> RHN has a bonobo-activation.i386 and a bonobo-activation.x86_64.
> 
> You probably only want the x86_64 rpm, so if the i386 rpm shows up, you
> might try rpm -e bonobo-activation.i386, then run up2date again.

Isn't openoffice only .i386?  Maybe since I only have the x86_64, openoffice
wants the .i386 version??  

> 
> Alternately, you could get both bonobo-activation rpms with up2date
> --get, and install them manually with rpm -U --force. They're only
> conflicting over a man page. :)

I'll give this a try.

thanks,
-chuck