Re: RHSA-2005:472-05 (kernel security update) not required for all?

[Ed Greshko <Ed Greshko greshko com>]

Ben wrote:

> This single machine was kickstarted in an identical manner (other than
> using a u5 rather than a u4 kickstart set) to another machine, runs on
> identical hardware and has all the same RPMs on.  That other machine
> doesn't require either errata.  I don't get it.
> 
> Does anyone know what's going on?

Nope.  Similar thing here....

But, when I ran up2date on my system that wasn't listed in RHN for the
kernel update....it did update.  So, at least one part is working
correctly.  :-)