Re: RHSA-2005:472-05 (kernel security update) not required for all?

[Jussi Silvennoinen <jussi_taroon silvennoinen net>]

> > This single machine was kickstarted in an identical manner (other than
> > using a u5 rather than a u4 kickstart set) to another machine, runs on
> > identical hardware and has all the same RPMs on.  That other machine
> > doesn't require either errata.  I don't get it.
> > 
> > Does anyone know what's going on?
> 
> Nope.  Similar thing here....
> 
> But, when I ran up2date on my system that wasn't listed in RHN for the
> kernel update....it did update.  So, at least one part is working
> correctly.  :-)

Plus inconsistencies between RHEL3 channel packages and it's ISO's.

Packages in U5 ISO:
mysql-3.23.58-16.RHEL3.1.i386.rpm
dhcp-3.0.1-10_EL3.i386.rpm

Packages from rhn.redhat.com:
mysql-3.23.58-15.RHEL3.1.i386
dhcp-3.0pl2-6.14.1.i386

I opened a support ticket an hour ago about this.

-- 

  Jussi