[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: TUX patches for Alpha

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo elte hu>
To: Phillip Ezolt <ezolt perf zko dec com>
Cc: TUX Development Mailing List <tux-list redhat com>,William Carr <wcarr perf zko dec com>,"Stanley, Dave" <Dave Stanley compaq com>, <frival zk3 dec com>,<paula smith compaq com>
Subject: Re: TUX patches for Alpha
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:14:48 +0100 (CET)

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Phillip Ezolt wrote:

> > log files and tux2w3c have some 32-bitness and endianness assumptions, but
> > otherwise they should be fine.
>
> We've begun to dig into this.  Is there any reason that you do all the
> pointer aritmetic instead just inserting everything into a struct?

because it's a mixed binary-field and variable-length character-array
thing, there is no straightfoward way to put it into a structure.

	Ingo

References:
- Re: TUX patches for Alpha
  - From: Phillip Ezolt <ezolt@perf.zko.dec.com>

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []