[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Xdg-list digest, Vol 1 #432 - 11 msgs
- From: Navindra Umanee <navindra cs mcgill ca>
- To: Linas Vepstas <linas linas org>, George Staikos <staikos kde org>
- Cc: Mike Hearn <mike theoretic com>, xdg-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Xdg-list digest, Vol 1 #432 - 11 msgs
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:07:55 -0400
Linas Vepstas <linas linas org> wrote:
> Qt is not suitable for use inside of non-graphical, server apps.
As an aside, Trolltech has proposed/considered splitting Qt before
(there is a project that already does it for the GPL version:
http://www.uwyn.com/projects/tinyq/). Perhaps in Qt4.
> Its also not suitable for C programmers.
You could export a C interface for those programmers, although no-one
has proposed doing that... Meaning that yes, you can have a C++
implementation of a library that is suitable for C programmers.
So it is not entirely inconceivable that Qt could be used as a base
library... although unlikely. :-)
Cheers,
Navin.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]