Re: Xdg-list digest, Vol 1 #432 - 11 msgs

[Robert Wittams <robert wittams com>]

That standardisation would almost certianly require relicencing that subset
of Qt as LGPL at the most... something I don't think Trolltech would like
to do right now. I think if any C++ lib was to become a wrapped standard
for C containers, it'll be the stl. 

And thats not going to happen either...  


Navindra Umanee wrote:

> Martin Konold <martin konold erfrakon de> wrote:
>> http://lists.trolltech.com/qt-interest/1997-11/thread00050-0.html
>> http://dot.kde.org/1003877941/
> 
> Nice, thanks for the URLs.
> 
> Another option would be exporting bindings at a more fundamental level
> ie, within Qt itself...  That way you don't have to install a separate
> wrapper.
> 
> Trolltech might be interested in doing that if there's a chance of
> standardising qlib.
> 
> Cheers,
> Navin.