[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Another question on Fedora GL
- From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris www linux org uk>
- To: xfree86-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Another question on Fedora GL
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:53:07 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Alex Deucher wrote:
>This was an issue with 4.3.0 as I recall. It was fixed in DRI cvs, I'm
>not sure if the fix has made it's way to fedora.
I don't recall hearing about this issue before, so it probably
isn't fixed in our packages unless it is fixed in XFree86's 4.3.0
stable branch xf-4_3-branch, as I track the branch.
If someone out there is interested in seeing this fixed in a
future Fedora Core XFree86 update digs the needed patches out and
files a bug report in Red Hat bugzilla with patch attached, or
sends them to XFree86.org to be included in xf-4_3-branch, I'd be
glad to include them in an update though.
Take care,
TTYL
>--- "Sergey V. Oudaltsov" <sergey oudaltsov clients ie> wrote:
>> Well, now all my GL libs look fine. But when I try to run
>> Counter-Strike
>> in OpenGL mode, I get this:
>>
>> err:opengl:wglGetProcAddress Warning : dynamic GL extension loading
>> not
>> supported by native GL library.
>>
>> On the web, I found this comment:
>>
>> This means that the glXGetProcAddressARB function seems not to be
>> supported by your OpenGL library.
>>
>> But AFAIK Mesa libGL has this function. Any ideas why would it
>> be lost in the battle by wine?
>>
>> Sorry if it not the right list to ask questions of that kind.
>> In such case, private answers would be appreciated as well.
--
Mike A. Harris
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]