[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Old Video Card Problem in RH9
- From: Thomas Dodd <ted cypress com>
- To: xfree86-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Old Video Card Problem in RH9
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:19:41 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mike A. Harris wrote:
| On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Thomas Dodd wrote:
|
|
|>| Looks like a problem with the PCI code. there is a fix, but it is
|>| awaiting feedback from the original poster. perhaps you can verify it.
|>
|>So it appears to be a S3 problem.
|
|
| Not sure what you mean by "S3" problem. S3 the company? The
| driver? The video card?
The card/chip. Other PCI cards tested on the sme system (according to
the bug report at xfree86.org) behave differently.
| If this is happening both with the native driver and with the
| vesa driver, I'm inclined to glare at the PCI code and wave a
| finger back and forth personally.
There is no native driver for this chip, the S3 964.
|>If I build the whole thing, what would I need to send bbb, to get the
|>change? I expect just the vesa driver, but not at all sure.
|
|
| I don't know what "what would I need to send bbb" means in
| English. Specifically the "bbb" part.
bbb it,net.au, the guy that was asking for help on redhat-install-list.
|>One other question, any know/suspected problems with compilers.
|>He's on RHL9, probably up to date on patches, but my box is a
|>hodge-podge of RHL9, FC1, 2.6 kernels, and other stuff.
|>
|>gcc-3.2.2-5, glibc-2.3.2-27.9.7
|>
|>Any other packages I should check for version issues?
|
|
| Nope. It is almost definitley an XFree86 issue. I would bet
| money on it. It just isn't a particularly interesting or mission
So I can apply the patch from xfree86.org to the SRPM from RHL9 on my
system and send him the new vesa driver and it should work?
| critical high-priority issue per se. The simple thing to do is
| buy a Radeon for $30 on Ebay or pricewatch.com. Saves hours and
I didn't think anybody mad a PCI version of the Radeon. All I've seen is
AGP.
-Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAK9/c+mwggWqA1pQRAuAlAJ0WddHXAAwLWXjJPOY4pNFrChKOmwCfQhJA
NATynjXha7EEMIN3jPxa8WY=
=wViN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]