[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [PATCH] GCC seriously needs to be less picky.



On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 04:07:33PM -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> Don't tell me I have to catch the return value of write in a variable just
> to later complain that I'm not doing anything with that variable.  That's
> borderline sociopathic behavior.
> ---
>  configure.ac |    6 +++++-
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 6e677b5..ab37f4a 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -185,8 +185,12 @@ if test x$ipv6 = xyes ; then
>      AC_SUBST(IPV6_CFLAGS, [-DENABLE_IPV6])
>  fi
>  
> +# GCC likes to bomb out on some ridiculous warnings.  Add your favorites
> +# here.
> +SHUT_UP_GCC="-Wno-unused-but-set-variable"
> +
>  # Add remaining compiler flags we want to use
> -CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Wall -Werror -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE"
> +CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Wall -Werror $SHUT_UP_GCC -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE"
>  
>  # Filter CFLAGS (remove duplicate flags)
>  cflags_filter() {
> -- 
> 1.7.1.1

1000 acks.

-- 
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)

Attachment: pgp49ua65v8V0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]