Intel ICH9R Raid5 supported?
Hall, Eric R
eric.r.hall at intel.com
Thu Jan 31 21:41:25 UTC 2008
Daniel -
Nope. The Intel Matrix RAID Option ROM simply creates/modifies metadata on the disks; it's up to an OS level utility [dmraid] to rebuild a set.
Hopefully by the time you would need to rebuild, dmraid will support it! At least, I hope so!
- Eric
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ataraid-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:ataraid-list-
>bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Guzmán
>Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 11:55 AM
>To: ATARAID
>Subject: Re: Intel ICH9R Raid5 supported?
>
>Eric, thank you, that is what I wanted to know.
>
>I am using 4 brand new disks, so I do not plan on rebuilding for a time (I
>hope so!).
>Even in case of disk failure, is rebuild possible via Intel BIOS Utility??
>
>Regards,
>Daniel
>
>
>2008/1/28, Hall, Eric R <eric.r.hall at intel.com>:
>
> Daniel -
>
> Keep in mind that dm-raid4-5 is still considered 'experimental.'
>
> Raid5 would work fine in a home environment as long as you do not
>plan on rebuilding after a failure [at the moment]. Since the dm-raid4-5
>patch is still considered experimental, you should weight your risks of
>data loss.
>
> I have tested Heinz's dm-raid4-5 patch on several ICH systems and
>have had good success with it; even after pulling a drive out to simulate a
>failure. If a failure would occur, you would have the opportunity to back-
>up the data before the set completely failed.
>
> Raid5 rebuild functionality isn't quite here yet. But it will be!
>Everyone is still working hard to update dmraid to rebuild failed sets.
>
> - Eric
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ataraid-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:ataraid-list-
> >bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Guzmán
> >Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:47 AM
> >To: ATARAID
> >Subject: Re: Intel ICH9R Raid5 supported?
> >
> >Brian, thank you very much for your response.
> >
> >Since this patch is Alpha (experimental) software, how reliable is
>it for a
> >home environment?
> >Is development status enough for being reasonably safe from data
>lost?
> >Regards.
> >
> >
> >2008/1/27, Wood, Brian J <brian.j.wood at intel.com>:
> >
> > Raid 5 is supported, but not in the base kernel as of yet
>(it's still
> >experimental). You'll have to get the patch from Heinz Mauelshagen's
> >website (http://people.redhat.com/heinzm/) and rebuild the kernel.
>Then you
> >will be able to activate your raid 5 volume's.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________
> >
> >
> > From: ataraid-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:ataraid-list-
> >bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Guzmán
> > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 9:55 AM
> > To: ataraid-list at redhat.com
> > Subject: Intel ICH9R Raid5 supported?
> >
> >
> >
> > Chipsets: Intel P35 and ICH9R
> > Disks: 4x320 GB
> > Arrays: 1xRAID5 with 4 disks, 1xRAID0 with 4 disks
> > dmraid: dmraid 1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu5 (Kubuntu 7.10 package)
> >
> > Issue: My RAID0 is visible, but RAID5 not. Is ICH9R RAID5
>supported?
> >
> > I can not find any confirmation about that issue neither in
>the
> >README, nor the CHANGELOG, nor TODO file, nor mailing-list, etc.
> >
> > If not supported, will be supported in future?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ataraid-list mailing list
> Ataraid-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
>
>
More information about the Ataraid-list
mailing list