[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: seti at home



Uh-oh, you just compared WinNT to Linux, and since Linux
came out looking bad, expect to be bombed by Linux
zealots! ;^)

Sorry. I have been catching up on my reading and I have seen
way to many reactions to the Mindcraft benchmarks...

Thanks for the quick and dirty bechmark, it is interesting...

Sorry,

Ken
khansen@njcc.com

-----Original Message-----
From: jmd <jmd@infinet.com>
To: axp-list@redhat.com <axp-list@redhat.com>
Date: Sunday, July 18, 1999 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: seti at home


>I decided to see what difference there is between running Seti@home in
>Linux and NT on my box. The board is Cabriolet 275mhz 128M 2M cache.
>
>The differences have been kicked around a little....what the code is 
>optimized for (ev5 and mine is ev4)... and is it actually doing more
>"science", etc.
>
>RH 5.2 stock install returned 21+ hours to complete.
>NT 4.0 service pack 3 returned 12h 45mins
>
>jeff
>
>-- 
>To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
>'unsubscribe' as the subject.  Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com
>
>



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []