a very odd question especially for me.

Fri Jul 24 00:20:15 UTC 2015

Jude,
not in this case.  thanks for the ideas.
At this point I do not even have a functional Linux  machine, so that must 
be 
addressed  before I worry about how the rooter will work.  Including what 
distribution will best support music  creation.  I am asking about the 
latter on  the Linux Audio list.  Still,   I have never 
required any of what you described weather running a wireless device a 
wired one.

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Jude DaShiell wrote:

> Each port on that modem/router probably has a single digit number on it.
> That single digit is the fourth in an ip address that's ip4.  The ip6 
> protocol is different.  I know of two prefixes that have three digits 
> separated by periods.  One of them starts out with 192.168.x.y and the other 
> starts with 10.x.y.z.  Your modem/router will probably use the first 
> 192.168.x.yip4 numbering system to communicate.  The x in that 192.168.x.y is 
> usually the same number for all local connections on a router too.  A hint, 
> power cords usually plug into the bottom of routers; next in my case an 
> external modem cord connects moving upward. After that, computers connect. 
> Numbers for computers usually start at zero and go up to 3 if you can connect 
> four devices to a modem/router. I hope I haven't confused you any further.
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>
>>  Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:52:27
>>  From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen at shellworld.net>
>>  Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>>  To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>>  Subject: Re: a *very* odd question especially for me.
>>
>>  which is exactly what I said I was doing.  I indicated that my
>>  modem/rooter allows for multiple connections.
>> 
>>
>>  On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>> 
>> >  If you're going from one of your computers to another of your computers 
>> >  to get the work done that ought to be easier since all you connect to 
>> >  will be local.
>> > 
>> >  On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>> > 
>> > >   Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:41:20
>> > >   From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen at shellworld.net>
>> > >   Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>> > >   To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>> > >   Subject: Re: a *very* odd question especially for me.
>> > > 
>> > >   Hi Jude,
>> > >   I am not sure what you mean by a remote provider.
>> > >   Given I have an entire production studio, recording the material 
>> > >   should
>> > >   not be an issue.  also, it is my understanding that the various Linux
>> > >   programs for  music work can recognize a device connected to the 
>> > >   sound
>> > >   card,  i. e. a midi cable running from a keyboard to the midi port on 
>> > >   the
>> > >   card itself. The card is not doing the recording, it is providing the
>> > >   playback through  the speakers.  the software  with the ability to
>> > >   recognize a four duplex card is managing the recording.
>> > >   All this is done on a computer sitting in my office, assuming a real 
>> > >  Linux
>> > >   installation can be done with these goals in mind.
>> > >   All this of course assumes I am even on the same page as your idea.
>> > >   Thanks,
>> > >   Kare
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > >   On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>> > > 
>> > > >   The remote machine would have to record to disk its sound card 
>> > > >   output > 
>> > >  for you, then you would need to download those files in order to 
>> > >  listen > to them. Assuming your remote provider is able and willing to 
>> > >  provide > you those extra services.  They'll have to have a high 
>> > >  quality sound > card installed and you'll have to pre-arrange with 
>> > >  them when to start > the recording from the sound card and some means 
>> > >  to let them know to end > the recording and sync their disks so you'll 
>> > >  get a full copy of what you > recorded.
>> > > > >   On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>> > > > > >    Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:24:29
>> > > > >    From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen at shellworld.net>
>> > > > >    Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion 
>> > >  <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>> > > > >    To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>> > > > >    Subject: a *very* odd question especially for me.
>> > > > > > >    ...but what else is knew? laughs.
>> > > > >    How scriptable is Linux?
>> > > > >    Before the major players start  on a roll, let me explain using 
>> > > > >    the only
>> > > > >    functional way I can with the only operating system I use.
>> > > > >    *I do not have a fully functioning Linux box at all.*  I believe 
>> > > > >    we
>> > > > >    established this a while back.
>> > > > >    However there is a *single*  task I may be willing to dedicate > 
>> > > > >    > 
>> > >  hardware
>> > > > >    to, if this can be done.
>> > > > >    I have absolutely zero interest in any full fledged   aspect. 
>> > > > >    if I 
>> > > > >   cannot
>> > > > >    do this one thing the os has little appeal for me.  after a good 
>> > > > >    7 > 
>> > > >    years
>> > > > >    or so trying to get  Linux going and not finding anyone local 
>> > > > >    with > 
>> > > >    the
>> > > > >    skill I respect others appreciation but I am not having this 
>> > > > >    sort of
>> > > > >    experience.
>> > > > >    In the DOS operating system one could create .bat files that 
>> > > > >    managed
>> > > > >    several tasks with a single file.
>> > > > >    the autoexec.bat file is a good example.
>> > > > >    You can create them with a text editor, no major complex 
>> > > > >    commands
>> > > > >    required.
>> > > > >    If Linux has this ability, and I would be surprised if it did 
>> > > > >    not, > 
>> > > > here > >   is
>> > > > >    the situation.
>> > > > >    I am a professional singer.  When I perform I use real 
>> > > > >    musicians, 
>> > >  not
>> > > > >    their electronic equals which means I require arrangements for 
>> > > > >    them to
>> > > > >    play.
>> > > > >    I am writing a grand deal of material these days, and if I am 
>> > > > >    going to > >  get
>> > > > >    that material recorded  I must do the following.
>> > > > >    1 get the parts out of my head and into sheet music form, most 
>> > >  likely
>> > > > >    using a well outfitted keyboard instrument's for part of the 
>> > > > >    job.
>> > > > >    2 confirm via playback that what I have done will sound when 
>> > > > >    played as
>> > > > >    desired.
>> > > > >    and 3. get the material printed, or into printable form.
>> > > > > > >    Now, I know there are allot of  command line programs in 
>> > > > > > >    Linux
>> > > > >    distributions that can  accomplish my goals.
>> > > > >    The problem for me is getting the Linux side of the computing > 
>> > > > >    > 
>> > >  functional,
>> > > > >    or at the very least, a way for me to ssh telnet into a box 
>> > > > >    using my dos
>> > > > >    setup to run the programs themselves.
>> > > > >    Yes there is a question here!
>> > > > >    assuming I could get the computer hardware with the kind of 
>> > > > >    quality
>> > > > >    soundcard to Handel the multiple-track playback, is it possible 
>> > > > >    to 
>> > > do > >    the
>> > > > >    following.
>> > > > >    1, is Linux distribution is installed correctly in the first 
>> > > > >    place, ssh
>> > > > >    telnet  into that machine from my main one and
>> > > > >    2, using  scripting , assuming this can be done simply, create a 
>> > > > >    set of
>> > > > >    .bat file equivalents to run the various  programs I need from 
>> > > > >    the > 
>> > > >   command
>> > > > >    line?
>> > > > > > >    The other major hardware involved is no hardship.  I have a 
>> > > > > > >    > > 
>> > >  combination
>> > > > >    modem/rooter which works with both wireless and wired devices 
>> > > > >    and > 
>> > > >   multiple
>> > > > >    ports for the wired connection.
>> > > > >    I share that because I know even if I am not running anything > 
>> > > > >    > 
>> > >  directly
>> > > > >    from the Linux computer itself, it does need an Ethernet 
>> > > > >    connection of
>> > > > >    some kind generating some kind of ip for me to use for the ssh > 
>> > > > >    > 
>> > >  -telnet.
>> > > > >    again the idea is to do well basically what I do here for 
>> > >  shellworld, > >   and
>> > > > >    with other services.
>> > > > >    treat this box like a shell, ssh TELNET into it,  run the 
>> > > > >    scripts > 
>> > > > for > >   the
>> > > > >   music programs I desire, and leave.  The box will not  even need 
>> > > > >   > > 
>> > >  speech as
>> > > > >    I plan to use it.
>> > > > >    Possible at all?
>> > > > >    Karen
>> > > > > > >    _______________________________________________
>> > > > >    Blinux-list mailing list
>> > > > >    Blinux-list at redhat.com
>> > > > >    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>> > > > > > >   -- > >  _______________________________________________
>> > > >   Blinux-list mailing list
>> > > >   Blinux-list at redhat.com
>> > > >   https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>> > > > > 
>> > >   _______________________________________________
>> > >   Blinux-list mailing list
>> > >   Blinux-list at redhat.com
>> > >   https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>> > > 
>> > 
>> >  -- 
>> > 
>> >  _______________________________________________
>> >  Blinux-list mailing list
>> >  Blinux-list at redhat.com
>> >  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Blinux-list mailing list
>>  Blinux-list at redhat.com
>>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>> 
>
> -- 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
>