[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Cluster-devel] [PATCH] [GFS2] bz 276631 : GFS2: chmod hung - TRY 3



This is a rewrite of the patch.  We decided it was a better
approach to call separate wrapper functions than trying to work around
the problem with a spin_lock.
--
The problem boiled down to a race between the gdlm_init_threads()
function initializing thread1 and its setting of blist = 1.
Essentially, "if (current == ls->thread1)" was checked by the thread
before the thread creator set ls->thread1.

Since thread1 is the only thread who is allowed to work on the
blocking queue, and since neither thread thought it was thread1, no one
was working on the queue.  So everything just sat.

This patch reuses the ls->async_lock spin_lock to fix the race,
and it fixes the problem.  I've done more than 2000 iterations of the
loop that was recreating the failure and it seems to work.

Dave Teigland brought up the question of whether we should do this
another way.  For example, by checking for the task name "lock_dlm1"
instead.  I'm open to opinions.
--
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso redhat com> 
--
diff -pur a/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c b/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c
--- a/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c	2007-09-13 17:33:58.000000000 -0500
+++ b/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c	2007-09-14 09:16:07.000000000 -0500
@@ -268,20 +268,16 @@ static inline int check_drop(struct gdlm
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int gdlm_thread(void *data)
+static int gdlm_thread(void *data, int blist)
 {
 	struct gdlm_ls *ls = (struct gdlm_ls *) data;
 	struct gdlm_lock *lp = NULL;
-	int blist = 0;
 	uint8_t complete, blocking, submit, drop;
 	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
 
 	/* Only thread1 is allowed to do blocking callbacks since gfs
 	   may wait for a completion callback within a blocking cb. */
 
-	if (current == ls->thread1)
-		blist = 1;
-
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		add_wait_queue(&ls->thread_wait, &wait);
@@ -333,12 +329,22 @@ static int gdlm_thread(void *data)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int gdlm_thread1(void *data)
+{
+	return gdlm_thread(data, 1);
+}
+
+static int gdlm_thread2(void *data)
+{
+	return gdlm_thread(data, 0);
+}
+
 int gdlm_init_threads(struct gdlm_ls *ls)
 {
 	struct task_struct *p;
 	int error;
 
-	p = kthread_run(gdlm_thread, ls, "lock_dlm1");
+	p = kthread_run(gdlm_thread1, ls, "lock_dlm1");
 	error = IS_ERR(p);
 	if (error) {
 		log_error("can't start lock_dlm1 thread %d", error);
@@ -346,7 +352,7 @@ int gdlm_init_threads(struct gdlm_ls *ls
 	}
 	ls->thread1 = p;
 
-	p = kthread_run(gdlm_thread, ls, "lock_dlm2");
+	p = kthread_run(gdlm_thread2, ls, "lock_dlm2");
 	error = IS_ERR(p);
 	if (error) {
 		log_error("can't start lock_dlm2 thread %d", error);



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]