[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Cluster-devel] Bug on dlm



Hi,
This bug could be causing this?


[root inf17 ~]# clustat
Member Status: Inquorate

 Member Name                        ID   Status
 ------ ----                        ---- ------
 inf17                                 1 Online, Local
 inf18                                 2 Offline
 inf19                                 3 Offline


[root inf18 ~]# clustat
Member Status: Quorate

 Member Name                        ID   Status
 ------ ----                        ---- ------
 inf17                                 1 Online
 inf18                                 2 Online, Local
 inf19                                 3 Offline


[root inf17 ~]# group_tool
type             level name       id       state
fence            0     default    00010001 JOIN_START_WAIT
[1]
dlm              1     rgmanager  00020001 JOIN_ALL_STOPPED
[1]

[root inf18 ~]# group_tool
type             level name       id       state
fence            0     default    00000000 JOIN_STOP_WAIT
[1 2]
dlm              1     rgmanager  00010002 JOIN_START_WAIT
[2]

[root inf17 ~]# cman_tool status
Version: 6.0.1
Config Version: 4
Cluster Name: boumort
Cluster Id: 13356
Cluster Member: Yes
Cluster Generation: 3824
Membership state: Cluster-Member
Nodes: 1
Expected votes: 2
Total votes: 1
Quorum: 2 Activity blocked
Active subsystems: 7
Flags:
Ports Bound: 0
Node name: inf17
Node ID: 1
Multicast addresses: 239.192.52.96
Node addresses: 192.168.22.17


[root inf18 ~]# cman_tool status
Version: 6.0.1
Config Version: 4
Cluster Name: boumort
Cluster Id: 13356
Cluster Member: Yes
Cluster Generation: 3820
Membership state: Cluster-Member
Nodes: 2
Expected votes: 2
Total votes: 2
Quorum: 2
Active subsystems: 7
Flags:
Ports Bound: 0 177
Node name: inf18
Node ID: 2
Multicast addresses: 239.192.52.96
Node addresses: 192.168.22.18


Patrick Caulfield wrote:
Jordi Prats wrote:
Hi,
I've found this while starting my server. It's a F7 with the latest
version avaliable.

Hope this helps :)

Jordi

Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: dlm: rgmanager: recover 1
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: dlm: rgmanager: add member 2
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: dlm: rgmanager: total members 1 error 0
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: dlm: rgmanager: dlm_recover_directory
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: dlm: rgmanager: dlm_recover_directory 0
entries
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel:
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: =====================================
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: -------------------------------------
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: dlm_recoverd/2963 is trying to release
lock (&ls->ls_in_recovery) at:
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: [<ee67b874>] dlm_recoverd+0x265/0x433 [dlm]
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel: but there are no more locks to release!
Jul 26 23:52:51 inf18 kernel:

Yeah, we know about it. It's not actually a bug, just the lockdep checking code
being a little over-enthusiastic. Unfortunately there aren't any annotations
available to make it quiet either.

The trick is to live with it, or to use kernels that have a little less
debugging compiled in, which you would want to do for production anyway :)


Patrick




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]