[Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH] misc: use a proper range for minor number dynamic allocation
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Mon Nov 9 21:32:20 UTC 2009
On 11/09/2009 01:28 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> The proposed solution uses the not yet reserved range from 64 to 127. If
>> more devices are needed, we may push 64 to 16. Moreover, if we don't
>> need to give priority to the higher numbers anymore, we can start using
>> the bitmap/bitops functions.
>
> So... misc minors 64 to 127 are presently unused?
>
Perhaps we should just start at 256 and go upward, or even 1048575 and
go downward.
-hpa
More information about the Cluster-devel
mailing list