[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Cluster-devel] [fence-virt PATCH] fix handling of VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_STARTED

(2011/10/26 8:30), Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On 09/19/2011 04:32 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote:
>> On 09/13/2011 04:44 AM, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
>>> I attached the patch for this problem.
>>> * Modified to send a SIGHUP to the primary thread from the secondary
>>>      thread detects the start of the VM, and
>>>      the primary thread is modified so as to select() the requests from
>>>      the VM which started.
>> That's certainly one way of doing it.  I might have used
>> 'pthread_cond_singal'.
> I am sorry for the delay.
> I have a fix based on yours that uses a pipe to wake up select() rather
> than pthread_kill; I'll attach it here.  This ends up being a bit lower
> impact, as well; it doesn't require changing the main program - only the
> serial/vmchannel plugin.
> Apart from that, the patch here is largely the same.
> Let me know what you think at your convenience.
> -- Lon

Hi, Lon

Thank you for your reply.
I tested this patch, and confirmed that the problem was solved.
(It was good also when four VM (s) was started simultaneously.)

Many thanks!

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]