[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Cluster-devel] gfs2: fix skip unlock condition



Hi,

Now in the -nmw tree. Thanks,

Steve.

On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 17:52 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> The recent commit fb6791d100d1bba20b5cdbc4912e1f7086ec60f8
> included the wrong logic.  The lvbptr check was incorrectly
> added after the patch was tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland redhat com>
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c b/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c
> index b906ed1..9802de0 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
>  {
>  	struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = gl->gl_sbd;
>  	struct lm_lockstruct *ls = &sdp->sd_lockstruct;
> +	int lvb_needs_unlock = 0;
>  	int error;
>  
>  	if (gl->gl_lksb.sb_lkid == 0) {
> @@ -294,8 +295,12 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
>  	gfs2_update_request_times(gl);
>  
>  	/* don't want to skip dlm_unlock writing the lvb when lock is ex */
> +
> +	if (gl->gl_lksb.sb_lvbptr && (gl->gl_state == LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE))
> +		lvb_needs_unlock = 1;
> +
>  	if (test_bit(SDF_SKIP_DLM_UNLOCK, &sdp->sd_flags) &&
> -	    gl->gl_lksb.sb_lvbptr && (gl->gl_state != LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE)) {
> +	    !lvb_needs_unlock) {
>  		gfs2_glock_free(gl);
>  		return;
>  	}




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]