[Cluster-devel] [PATCH v2 01/17] locks: consolidate "nolease" routines

Jeff Layton jeff.layton at primarydata.com
Thu Sep 4 12:49:38 UTC 2014


On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:41:51 -0400
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust at primarydata.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton at primarydata.com> wrote:
> > GFS2 and NFS have setlease routines that always just return -EINVAL.
> > Turn that into a generic routine that can live in fs/libfs.c.
> >
> > Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust at primarydata.com>
> > Cc: <linux-nfs at vger.kernel.org>
> > Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com>
> > Cc: <cluster-devel at redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton at primarydata.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/gfs2/file.c     | 22 +---------------------
> >  fs/libfs.c         | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  fs/nfs/file.c      | 13 +------------
> >  fs/nfs/internal.h  |  1 -
> >  fs/nfs/nfs4file.c  |  2 +-
> >  include/linux/fs.h |  1 +
> >  6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust at primarydata.com>
> 

Thanks. While spinning this up, I did have a momentary pause to wonder
if -ENOLCK would be a better return value here.

It would make it easier to distinguish this from from "oops, I passed
in bogus arguments". For now, I'll leave it as -EINVAL, but it's
something to consider...

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton at primarydata.com>




More information about the Cluster-devel mailing list