[Crash-utility] crash versioning?
Dave Anderson
anderson at redhat.com
Wed Oct 1 13:01:06 UTC 2008
Jun Koi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I notice that the way Dave name crash version is a bit special (never
> seen anywhere for me) : 4.0-7.1, 4.0-7.2, .... What is the point of
> naming versions that way??
>
> Thanks,
> J
It's just rpm's n-v-r convention.
It does get driven somewhat by the Red Hat internal packaging
conventions/requirements. But don't look for any particular
rhyme or reason.
More information about the Crash-utility
mailing list