[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Crash-utility] [ANNOUNCE][RFC] gcore extension module: user-mode process core dump



Hello Dave,

From: Dave Anderson <anderson redhat com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] gcore extension module: user-mode process core dump
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:34:35 -0500 (EST)

> To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d hatayama jp fujitsu com>
> Cc: "Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and development" <crash-utility redhat com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:34:35 -0500 (EST)
> X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.9_GA_2686 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.9_GA_2686)
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Hello Dave,
>> 
>> I've just fixed gcore. The patset is attached to this mail.
>> 
>> Could you review and apply them if okay?
> 
> Can you create a gcore.tar.bz2 file like you did with the last
> patch-set?
> 
> I will write up a new entry on the "extensions" page on my people
> site here: http://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions.html
> 
> Since the module has so many files, I'll put a link to the
> gcore.tar.bz2 file, instructions on how to set it up, etc,
> in the description of gcore.  In fact, I've already done that
> on a scratch page here:
> 
>   http://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions2.html

Thanks for setting up them.

I've attached gcore.tar.bz2 as you suggested. Please confirm it.

In addition, I've improved restore_frame_pointer(). I expect gcore
hang up can no longer be reproduced.

Well, I have a question: in what form should I send new patchset
afterwards? A whole files in the form of gcore.tar.bz2 similaly? or in
the form of diffs?

Thanks.
HATAYAMA

Attachment: gcore.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]