[Crash-utility] [RESEND] Re: [PATCH 00/11] sadump: Incremental update patches

[Dave Anderson]

I don't know what it is about Daisuke's mail, but when I respond to them
with my Zimbra mailer, the archived version gets screwed up for some reason:

 https://www.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/2011-October/msg00091.html

The same thing happened last month when I responded to another of Daisuke's
emails. 

Anyway, I believe the digested version will be OK, but in order to archive this
message properly, here it is again:

----- Original Message -----
... [ cut ] ...
> > If I remove the "use_regs_in_elf_notes_on_kdump_fmt_from_sadump.patch.patch" patch
> > the backtraces are correct.  Now, it may be true that the changes you made make
> > sense with respect to sadump dumpfiles, where the register set stored in the header
> > is a reflection of the last location that each cpu ran (?).
> >
> > But those changes are totally unacceptable for compressed kdump dumpfiles.
>
> I undestand the situtation.
>
> I attach V2 patch. I confirmed this doesn't break the logic explained
> above. Could you review this?
>
> Thanks.
> HATAYAMA, Daisuke

Hello Daisuke,

This v2 version tests OK.

The sadump patchset, plus this updated patch, are queued for crash-6.0.0.

Thanks,
  Dave