[Crash-utility] using crash for ARM

paawan oza paawan1982 at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 4 14:06:53 UTC 2012


I shall provide at the earliest. 
Thanks for your response.

Regards,
Oza.




________________________________
 From: Dave Anderson <anderson at redhat.com>
To: paawan oza <paawan1982 at yahoo.com>; "Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and development" <crash-utility at redhat.com> 
Cc: Thomas Fänge <thomas.fange at sonymobile.com>; Rabin Vincent <rabin at rab.in>; Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg at iki.fi>; jan karlsson <jan.karlsson at sonymobile.com> 
Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Crash-utility] using crash for ARM
 


----- Original Message -----

> > Paawan, your fix looks sane to me but can you add a small comment describing
> > why this is done?
> >
> 
> ok,
> Let us wait for Dave and others to comment on it, and try to see how
> this could be pushed.
> 
> Regards,
> Oza.

Oza, 

Can you please append your actual patch as Rabin has done?  The only
thing that I have from you is this pseudo-code description:

> then I have to do workaround for section level physical addresses as
> follows.
> page_dir = pgd + PGD_OFFSET(vaddr) * 2;
> if (bit(vaddr,20)) //if bit is set then move to the next pgd */
> page_dir = page_dir + 1;
> FILL_PGD(PAGEBASE(pgd), KVADDR, PGDIR_SIZE());
> pgd_pte = ULONG(machdep->pgd + PGDIR_OFFSET(page_dir));
> 

Then Mika can decide on how to proceed with the two patches.

Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/attachments/20121004/7be772d9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Crash-utility mailing list