[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [dm-devel] New -udm?



You're correct.  I'll rewrite it on Thursday this week.
I'll use the same methods Lars used in the dm-emc.c


On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 04:36:53PM -0700, Mike Christie wrote:
> christophe varoqui wrote:
> >On dim, 2005-04-10 at 21:29 +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Alasdair,
> >>
> >>I'm resync'ing against -udm and would like to pull all recent fixes if
> >>possible. Do you have anything more recent than the 2.6.11-rc3-udm2?
> >>
> >>
> >>Sincerely,
> >>   Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb suse de>
> >>
> >There is this hwhandler from Dave Olien, that needs auditing, but is a
> >must-have for StorageWorks and FSC FibreCat users.
> >
> >http://christophe.varoqui.free.fr/multipath-tools/dm-scsi-start.patch
> >
> >Would be good to have in an enterprise distro ...
> >
> >Regards,
> 
> 
> 
> +static void sstart_pg_init(struct hw_handler *hwh, unsigned bypassed,
> +			struct path *path)
> +{
> +	struct block_device *bdev = path->dev->bdev;
> +	struct gendisk *disk = bdev->bd_disk;
> +	struct scsi_device *sdev = scsi_disk(disk)->device;
> +	int result;
> +
> +	result = scsi_ioctl(sdev, SCSI_IOCTL_START_UNIT, NULL);
> 
> 
> 
> is scsi_ioctl depreciated for this use? Besides that I think it 
> allocates memory with GFP_KERNEL which I do not think you want here, and 
> you will want some way to gaurantee you can make forward progress.
> 
> 
> +	dm_pg_init_complete(path, result?MP_FAIL_PATH:0);
> +}
> +
> 
> 
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]