[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)
- From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura ce jp nec com>
- To: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Cc: Mike Anderson <andmike us ibm com>, Greg KH <gregkh suse de>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb suse de>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:13:56 -0500
Hi,
Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> This patch needs splitting up so that independent changes can be
> considered separately.
>
> c.f. The proposal from Mike Anderson (repeated below) which I prefer
> because it makes it clear that a table always belongs to exactly one md.
I like his proposed patch.
The interface is useful for my purpose too and moving table
creation inside _hash_lock means I don't need dm_get() neither.
Is it going to be pushed to upstream?
I'll remake my patch based on it.
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Solutions (America), Inc.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]