[dm-devel] LVM2 tools<-->library<-->driver compatibility
Joe Harvell
jharvell at dogpad.net
Tue May 16 18:58:43 UTC 2006
I am suspecting a driver <--> tools incompatibility:
I created the VGs/LVs in the 2006.0 install environment:
LVM Version: 2.01.09 (2005-04-04)
Library: 1.02.03 (2005-06-13)
Driver: 4.4.0-ioctl
My installed environment has newer version of the tools and library:
LVM Version: 2.02.05 (2006-04-21)
Library: 1.02.03 (2006-02-08)
When I boot into the initrd, the Driver is the one in the
gentoo-sources-2.4.32-r4 kernel:
Driver: 4.1.1-ioctl.
The complaint seems to indicate the tools/library are violating the
driver's ioctl API. How can I tell what version of the tools I need for
this old driver? Can the old driver handle the metadata I created in the
install environment?Joe Harvell wrote:
> I am installing Gentoo Linux on my machine and I'm running into LVM
> problems. The installer CD is 2.6 kernel based, but I am installing a
> 2.4 kernel based system. Gentoo has an install profile for this to
> prevent programs and libraries that have a dependency on 2.6 kernel
> headers from being installed when a 2.4 profile is being used.
>
> As part of the install process, I created an LVM2 volume group
> containing LVs for /, /usr, /var, /opt, and /home. I created
> filesystems on these LVs and performed the installation no problem. I
> also configured and compiled the kernel, which is a 2.4.32 based kernel
> with LVM2 backported into it by the Gentoo developer team.
>
> I created the initrd which is based on an initrd I created myself and
> have been using successfully on 2.4 and 2.6 based kernels. It contains
> the LVM tools and libraries, along with disk drivers and the
> device-mapper driver.
>
> When I run vgscan, it finds the volume group no problem. However, when
> I run 'vgchange -ay <vgname>', I see three problems.
>
> 1. There are entries in /dev/mapper/<vgname>-<lvname>, but no symlinks
> in the form /dev/<vgname>/<lvname> --> /dev/mapper/<vgname>/<lvname>. I
> run 'lvm vgmknodes' and it remedies this.
>
> 2. I see five complaints from 'vgchange -ay <vgname>' (one for each LV)
> as follows:
>
> on stderr: device-mapper: table ioctl failed: Invalid argument
> on console (from dm-mod driver): device-mapper: one of name or uuid must
> be supplied, cmd (12)
>
> I ran vgchange under strace and here is the following snippet:
>
> open("/dev/mapper/control", O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE) = 9
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> mlockall(MCL_CURRENT|MCL_FUTURE) = 0
> brk(0x8936000) = 0x8936000
> brk(0x8b1e000) = 0x8b1e000
> getpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, 0) = 20
> setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, 0, -18) = 0
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
> address)
> stat64("/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part10", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0600,
> st_rdev=makedev(3, 10), ...}) = 0
> stat64("/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part11", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0600,
> st_rdev=makedev(3, 11), ...}) = 0
> stat64("/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part12", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0600,
> st_rdev=makedev(3, 12), ...}) = 0
> ioctl(9, DM_DEV_CREATE, 0x8109958) = 0
> ioctl(9, DM_TABLE_STATUS, 0x8109958) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> write(2, " ", 2) = 2
> write(2, "device-mapper: table ioctl faile"..., 51) = 51
> write(2, "\n", 1) = 1
>
> 3. When I try to mount the filesystem in that LV, it fails. I tried
> with different filesystem types and it's the same result. From within
> the 2.4 kernel based initrd, it fails. If I reboot into the 2.6 kernel
> based installer environment, no problem.
>
> This looks like an incompatibility between the lvm2 and/or device-mapper
> library code and the kernel device-mapper code. Here are the versions
> installed in the install environment (the one that works):
>
> lvm> version
> LVM version: 2.02.05 (2006-04-21)
> Library version: 1.02.03 (2006-02-08)
> Driver version: 4.4.0
>
> In the initrd, the only thing different would be the driver version.
> Later today I will have access to the machine again and I can run the
> lvm version command there to see what the driver version is. In the
> meantime, I am looking at the kernel sources and I don't see anything
> obvious in the driver/md directory.
>
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list