[dm-devel] Question about dmevents

Wood, Brian J brian.j.wood at intel.com
Fri Jul 20 16:57:28 UTC 2007


Hi Alasdair, I also read in the definition of DM_DEV_CREATE that the
uuid is optional. Since that is the case shouldn't the failure for not
having a uuid in "_alloc_thread_status()" be taken out?

Thank you, 

Brian Wood
Intel Corporation 
Digital Enterprise Group
Manageability & Platform Software Division
brian.j.wood at intel.com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dm-devel-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:dm-devel-bounces at redhat.com]
On
>Behalf Of Alasdair G Kergon
>Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:26 AM
>To: device-mapper development
>Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Question about dmevents
>
>See http://people.redhat.com/agk/talks/FOSDEM_2005/text41.html for info
>about
>how devices are referenced.
>
>Alasdair
>--
>agk at redhat.com
>
>--
>dm-devel mailing list
>dm-devel at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




More information about the dm-devel mailing list