[dm-devel] [PATCH] Remove capping from dev_loss_tmo

[James Smart]

Hannes,

Not sure I quite agree with your description of the two timers - but 
relative to the goal of
allowing a larger dev_loss_tmo when fast_io_fail_tmo is enabled, it's 
fine.  Interestingly, I
was looking at when it's disabled, does the cap kick back in - and 
realized that once we
enable fast fail, we don't allow it to be turned off.

Looks good.

Acked-by:  James Smart  <james.smart at emulex.com>

-- james s

Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Currently dev_loss_tmo is capped by SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT.
> This causes problem with multipathing when the 'no_path_retry' setting
> exceeds the dev_loss_tmo setting, as then the system might run into
> a deadlock when all paths have been removed temporarily for longer
> than dev_loss_tmo.
> The principal reasons for the capping has been that we should
> not allow a remote port to remain in status 'blocked' indefinitely,
> so the capping is there to ensure that the port status is being reset
> eventually.
> However, the fast_io_fail_tmo will also move the remote port out of
> the 'blocked' state, so for any HBA driver implementing both the
> capping should really be on the fast_io_fail_tmo, and not on the
> dev_loss_tmo.
> This patch implements just that, ie the fast_io_fail_tmo is capped
> to SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_TIMEOUT and the capping is removed from
> dev_loss_tmo when fast_io_fail_tmo is set.
> This allows us to synchronize the dev_loss_tmo setting to the
> 'no_path_retry' setting from multipathing thus avoiding the deadlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> index 573ce21..6f39bf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> @@ -475,7 +475,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(dev_loss_tmo,
>  		 "Maximum number of seconds that the FC transport should"
>  		 " insulate the loss of a remote port. Once this value is"
>  		 " exceeded, the scsi target is removed. Value should be"
> -		 " between 1 and SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT.");
> +		 " between 1 and SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT if"
> +		 " fast_io_fail_tmo is not set.");
>  
>  /*
>   * Netlink Infrastructure
> @@ -831,9 +832,17 @@ store_fc_rport_dev_loss_tmo(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  	    (rport->port_state == FC_PORTSTATE_NOTPRESENT))
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	val = simple_strtoul(buf, &cp, 0);
> -	if ((*cp && (*cp != '\n')) ||
> -	    (val < 0) || (val > SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT))
> +	if ((*cp && (*cp != '\n')) || (val < 0))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If fast_io_fail is off we have to cap
> +	 * dev_loss_tmo at SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT
> +	 */
> +	if (rport->fast_io_fail_tmo == -1 &&
> +	    val > SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	i->f->set_rport_dev_loss_tmo(rport, val);
>  	return count;
>  }
> @@ -914,9 +923,16 @@ store_fc_rport_fast_io_fail_tmo(struct device *dev,
>  		rport->fast_io_fail_tmo = -1;
>  	else {
>  		val = simple_strtoul(buf, &cp, 0);
> -		if ((*cp && (*cp != '\n')) ||
> -		    (val < 0) || (val >= rport->dev_loss_tmo))
> +		if ((*cp && (*cp != '\n')) || (val < 0))
>  			return -EINVAL;
> +		/*
> +		 * Cap fast_io_fail by dev_loss_tmo or
> +		 * SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT.
> +		 */
> +		if ((val >= rport->dev_loss_tmo) ||
> +		    (val > SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
>  		rport->fast_io_fail_tmo = val;
>  	}
>  	return count;
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>
>