[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/3] dm-target: target_type improvements



On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:19:42PM +0800, crquan gmail com wrote:
>> From: Cheng Renquan <crquan gmail com>
>> 3. totally remove tt_internal;
>> The 3rd patch may be controversial,
>> But I still think it's worth it:
>
> Well now that it's down to just one field for linking items I'm inclined to
> agree that it's OK.
>
> Do you (or anyone else) have any interest in creating and testing similar sets
> of patches for the other parts of device-mapper that use the same construction?

I just came across the device-mapper code and made the patches one
month ago, I want to know you (dm-dev)'s attitude toward this type of
struct reconstruction. Now I know it and can do more.

>
> Alasdair
> --
> agk redhat com

BTW, why you set Reply-to field to my email address? Maybe an accident
of your mail client?

-- 
Cheng Renquan (程任全), Shenzhen, China
Groucho Marx  - "I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury."


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]