[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 21/25] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support



On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Gui
Jianfeng<guijianfeng cn fujitsu com> wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> o Currently a request queue has got fixed number of request descriptors for
>>   sync and async requests. Once the request descriptors are consumed, new
>>   processes are put to sleep and they effectively become serialized. Because
>>   sync and async queues are separate, async requests don't impact sync ones
>>   but if one is looking for fairness between async requests, that is not
>>   achievable if request queue descriptors become bottleneck.
>>
>> o Make request descriptor's per io group so that if there is lots of IO
>>   going on in one cgroup, it does not impact the IO of other group.
>>
>> o This is just one relatively simple way of doing things. This patch will
>>   probably change after the feedback. Folks have raised concerns that in
>>   hierchical setup, child's request descriptors should be capped by parent's
>>   request descriptors. May be we need to have per cgroup per device files
>>   in cgroups where one can specify the upper limit of request descriptors
>>   and whenever a cgroup is created one needs to assign request descritor
>>   limit making sure total sum of child's request descriptor is not more than
>>   of parent.
>>
>>   I guess something like memory controller. Anyway, that would be the next
>>   step. For the time being, we have implemented something simpler as follows.
>>
>> o This patch implements the per cgroup request descriptors. request pool per
>>   queue is still common but every group will have its own wait list and its
>>   own count of request descriptors allocated to that group for sync and async
>>   queues. So effectively request_list becomes per io group property and not a
>>   global request queue feature.
>>
>> o Currently one can define q->nr_requests to limit request descriptors
>>   allocated for the queue. Now there is another tunable q->nr_group_requests
>>   which controls the requests descriptr limit per group. q->nr_requests
>>   supercedes q->nr_group_requests to make sure if there are lots of groups
>>   present, we don't end up allocating too many request descriptors on the
>>   queue.
>>
>
>  Hi Vivek,
>
>  In order to prevent q->nr_requests from becoming the bottle-neck of allocating
>  requests, whether we can update nr_requests accordingly when allocating or removing
>  a cgroup?

Vivek,
I agree with Gui here. In fact, it does not make much sense to keep
the nr_requests limit if we already have per cgroup limit in place.
This change also simplifies code quite a bit, as we can get rid of all
that sleep_on_global logic.

>
> --
> Regards
> Gui Jianfeng
>
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]