[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH, RFC 2/2] dm: support REQ_FLUSH directly

Hi Mike,

(08/27/10 23:13), Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> If there will be no need for supporting a request-based target
>> with num_flush_requests > 1, the special handling of flush
>> can be removed.
>> And since there is no such target in the current tree,
>> I don't object if you remove that part of code for good reason.
> OK, certainly something to keep in mind.  But _really_ knowing the
> multipath FLUSH+FUA performance difference (extra special-case code vs
> none) requires a full FLUSH conversion of request-based DM anyway.
> In general, request-based DM's barrier/flush code does carry a certain
> maintenance overhead.  It is quite a bit of distracting code in the core
> DM which isn't buying us anything.. so we _could_ just remove it and
> never look back (until we have some specific need for num_flush_requests
>> 1 in rq-based DM).

So, I'm not objecting to your idea.
Could you please create a patch to remove that?

Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]