[dm-devel] training mpath to discern between SCSI errors

Mike Snitzer snitzer at redhat.com
Fri Jan 14 13:59:17 UTC 2011


On Fri, Jan 14 2011 at  2:45am -0500,
Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de> wrote:

> On 01/14/2011 02:09 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 17 2010 at  9:06am -0500,
> > Mike Snitzer <snitzer at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, Dec 17 2010 at  4:47am -0500,
> >> Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 11/30/2010 11:59 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>>> Hannes,
> >>>>
> >>>> Any chance you've had time to fold your proposed logging changes in and
> >>>> rebase this patch?  Could you post that updated patch?
> >>>>
> >>> yes, will be following shortly.
> >>>
> >>>> I'd like to help see this patch through to inclussion when 2.6.38 merge
> >>>> window opens.  I can help with further review, testing and development.
> >>>>
> >>> Ok, thanks.
> >>
> >> I took some steps at furthering your work.  Here is the cover letter to
> >> the patches I resently sent to dm-devel:
> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2010-December/msg00090.html
> >>
> >> And here are the patches:
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/384612/
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/384602/
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/390882/
> >>
> >> Please feel free to change these how ever you see fit but your feedback
> >> is really appreciated.
> > 
> > Hannes,
> > 
> > Any update?  I'd really like to see this work get upstream ASAP.  I'm
> > doubtful that is possible for 2.6.38 given the merge window is likely to
> > close shortly.
> > 
> Sorry for the late answer; the above patches somehow got lost in my
> various mail folders :-(
> 
> But yes, the patchset looks okay.
> Feel free to add my Acked-by: to last two.

OK.

> > Regardless, if we could get consensus on this work now and then stage it
> > with James that would be great.
> > 
> Indeed. Will you resend it to linux-scsi or shall I do it?

I can resend, will do so shortly.

Thanks!
Mike




More information about the dm-devel mailing list