[dm-devel] dm: Integrity errors should not cause failover

[James Bottomley]

On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 10:14 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08 2011 at  1:54am -0500,
> Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Integrity errors need to be passed to the owner of the integrity
> > metadata for processing. Consequently EILSEQ should be passed up the
> > stack.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen at oracle.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer at redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks Martin.  But James has already staged a few patches associated
> with IO error differentation for 2.6.39.  Your dm-mpath patch will need
> to be rebased on that work; best to feed it to James too.
> 
> (we were gambling that there wouldn't be additional DM or block changes
> related to this work and figured it safe to have James carry all the
> SCSI, block and DM changes... ;)
> 
> Problem is I'm not seeing a 2.6.39 branch in James' scsi-2.6-misc.git
> (even though I know the changes are staged there ;)
> 
> See:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=79775567e0439ca47eb9f501e52c4b713d44cf89
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=751b2a7d623ead9e55f751a6087efeab454b5659
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=63583cca745f440167bf27877182dc13e19d4bcf
> 
> James,
> Any easy way to get Martin your 2.6.39 tree?  Do you have a branch (just
> the tag isn't exposed)?

Branch for what?  It's a linear tree with all the SCSI patches on
master.

James