[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes



On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:08:56 -0600 Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow redhat com>
wrote:

> 
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 8:20 AM, Brassow Jonathan wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Nov 24, 2013, at 6:03 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> > 
> >> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:30:43 -0600 Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow redhat com>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> When commit 773ca82 was made in v3.12-rc1, it caused RAID4/5/6 devices
> >>> that were created via device-mapper (dm-raid.c) to hang on creation.
> >>> This is not necessarily the fault of that commit, but perhaps the way
> >>> dm-raid.c was setting-up and activating devices.
> >>> 
> >>> Device-mapper allows I/O and memory allocations in the constructor
> >>> (i.e. raid_ctr()), but nominal and recovery I/O should not be allowed
> >>> until a 'resume' is issued (i.e. raid_resume()).  It has been problematic
> >>> (at least in the past) to call mddev_resume before mddev_suspend was
> >>> called, but this is how DM behaves - CTR then resume.  To solve the
> >>> problem, raid_ctr() was setting up the structures, calling md_run(), and
> >>> then also calling mddev_suspend().  The stage was then set for raid_resume()
> >>> to call mddev_resume().
> >>> 
> >>> Commit 773ca82 caused a change in behavior during raid5.c:run().
> >>> 'setup_conf->grow_stripes->grow_one_stripe' is called which creates the
> >>> stripe cache and increments 'active_stripes'.
> >>> 'grow_one_stripe->release_stripe' doesn't actually decrement 'active_stripes'
> >>> anymore.  The side effect of this is that when raid_ctr calls mddev_suspend,
> >>> it waits for 'active_stripes' to reduce to 0 - which never happens.
> >> 
> >> Hi Jon,
> >> this sounds like the same bug that is fixed by 
> >> 
> >> commit ad4068de49862b083ac2a15bc50689bb30ce3e44
> >> Author: majianpeng <majianpeng gmail com>
> >> Date:   Thu Nov 14 15:16:15 2013 +1100
> >> 
> >>   raid5: Use slow_path to release stripe when mddev->thread is null
> >> 
> >> which is already en-route to 3.12.x.  Could you check if it fixes the bug for
> >> you?
> > 
> > Sure, I'll check.  Just reading the subject of the patch, I have high hopes.  The slow path decrements 'active_stripes', which was causing the above problem...  I'll make sure though.
> 
> Yes, this patch fixes the issue in 3.12-rc1+.
> 
> However, there is still a problem I'm searching for that was introduced in commit 566c09c (at least that's what I get when bisecting).
> 
> The problem only shows up when I have taken a snapshot of a RAID5 device and only if I have cycled the device before adding the snapshot:
> 1> lvcreate --type raid5 -i 3 -L 20M -n lv vg
> 2> lvchange -an vg/lv
> 3> lvchange -ay vg/lv
> 4> lvcreate -s vg/lv -L 50M -n snap
> 5> lvchange -an vg/lv
> 6> lvchange -ay vg/lv -- BUG: line 292 of raid5.c
> 
> The current bug triggers on the 'BUG_ON(atomic_read(&conf->active_stripes)==0)' in do_release_stripe().  I'm not sure why yet.
> 
>  brassow

I've had a look and I must say I'm not sure either.
I keep wondering if something is wrong with the locking in get_active_stripe.
The region covered by device_lock is not much smaller with the whole now
covered by hash_locks[hash].  I cannot see a problem with the locking but I
might be missing something.  A missing atomic_inc of active_stripes in there
could cause your problem.

As you can easily reproduce, could you try expanding the range covered by
device_lock to be the whole branch where sh is not NULL.  If that makes a
difference it would be quite instructive.  I don't hold high hopes though.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]