[dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dm-multipath: reduce memory pressure during requeuing

Hannes Reinecke hare at suse.de
Mon Jan 20 12:15:09 UTC 2014


On 01/20/2014 12:59 PM, Junichi Nomura wrote:
> On 01/17/14 19:42, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> @@ -908,19 +910,9 @@ static void multipath_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
>>  static int multipath_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct request *clone,
>>  			 union map_info *map_context)
>>  {
>> -	int r;
>>  	struct multipath *m = (struct multipath *) ti->private;
>>  
>> -	if (set_mapinfo(m, map_context) < 0)
>> -		/* ENOMEM, requeue */
>> -		return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
>> -
>> -	clone->cmd_flags |= REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT;
>> -	r = map_io(m, clone, map_context);
>> -	if (r < 0 || r == DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE)
>> -		clear_mapinfo(m, map_context);
>> -
>> -	return r;
>> +	return map_io(m, clone, map_context);
>>  }
> 
> Now multipath_map() is the only caller of map_io() and
> most part of multipath_map() is moved to map_io(),
> there is no reason to separate those functions.
> You could fold map_io() into multipath_map().
> 
Yes, I could.

However, I didn't do so (for this patchset)
as this would make reviewing harder.

But yeah, it should be merged.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare at suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)




More information about the dm-devel mailing list